Skip to page content

Discuss the findings with workers

Use worker discussions to understand the conditions behind priority findings and identify practical changes. Focus groups are one option; choose a format that lets people speak safely.

Prepare a useful discussion

  1. Choose the findings you need to understand. Bring a short, accessible summary; an AI report is optional.
  2. Plan a safe discussion and choose a suitable facilitator. Explain confidentiality and how concerns needing individual follow-up will be handled.
  3. Record contributing conditions and suggested changes without identifying participants. Tell workers how and when you will respond.

From a finding to a practical change

Illustrative conversation. Check what fits your workplace rather than assuming this explanation applies.

  1. Finding to explore

    Workload is high.

    Bring the finding to workers and check whose experience it represents.

  2. Ask when it happens

    When does work become unmanageable?

    Example response: urgent requests arrive from several managers at once.

  3. Understand the work

    What makes those requests difficult to manage?

    Example response: no shared priorities and no one authorised to defer a request.

  4. Discuss what could change

    What would help you manage competing demands?

    Example proposal: agree one request queue and a person who can resolve priorities.

Different causes need different actions. Check the proposed change with workers before carrying it into the action plan.

Inquiry questions to explore

Choose a topic and adapt its prompts to your findings. The print version includes all four topics, regardless of this selection.

Role demands (overload, ambiguity, conflict)

  1. When does work feel unmanageable? What's usually happening at those times?
  2. Are there things you're asked to do that conflict with each other or with how you think the work should be done?
  3. Is it clear what success looks like in your role? If not, what's missing?

Internal or external facilitator?

A judgement call based on your circumstances:

→
Open and honest feedback: If the survey flagged concerns close to the facilitator (leadership trust, management support), participants may be less candid internally. Consider a facilitator outside the reporting line whom participants trust.
→
Seriousness of the issues: If results suggest bullying, harassment, or significant interpersonal conflict, an external facilitator experienced in sensitive conversations is worth it.
→
Availability, time, and cost: An internal HR or P&C professional outside the group's reporting line can run effective groups - often the practical choice at scale.

Agree how people can raise sensitive matters privately. Do not ask participants to discuss identifiable allegations in the group; arrange appropriate individual follow-up.

Design your focus groups (full guide)

The full design guide covers recruitment, a 90-minute run sheet, analysis and other consultation formats. Adapt it with the person who will run the sessions.

Use your themes to draft the action plan

Use the themes and suggested changes from your worker discussions to choose controls and complete the action plan template. Bring your session notes and any report recommendations to Action Planning; you transfer the findings into the template yourself.